Department of Architecture and Urban Design, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Department of Architecture and Urban Design, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
The ongoing destruction of the Generalštab complex in Belgrade, designed by Nikola Dobrović, represents a critical loss to modernist architecture, urban identity, and collective memory. Built between 1955 and 1965, the complex is a masterpiece of Yugoslav modernism, integrating symbolic topography, tectonic expression, and spatial dynamism, as well as technological advancements. Its partial destruction during the 1999 NATO bombings and subsequent neglect led to its present deteriorating state, underscoring the vulnerability of architectural and cultural heritage in the face of political and economic pressures.
This paper investigates the architectural, historical, and cultural ramifications of the Generalštab’s disappearance. Using a multidisciplinary methodology that integrates archival research, spatial analysis, and comparative studies of modernist heritage preservation, the research explores how the building’s erasure alters the perception of urban continuity and reconfigures historical discourse. The findings suggest that the loss extends beyond the physical structure: it fractures the city’s architectural fabric, diminishes opportunities for historical reflection, and weakens the dialogue between present and past through the erosion of urban identity.
By contextualizing these outcomes within global paradigms of adaptive reuse and contested heritage, this analysis underscores the importance of preserving architectural narratives as constitutive elements of collective memory. It emphasizes the need for a critical reimagining of heritage preservation strategies, proposing a nuanced and proactive approach that recognizes modernist landmarks as both cultural repositories and agents of urban continuity in shaping future landscapes.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
